Are we stronger today than 9 years ago?
It turned out to be nice and sunny this Saturday, nine years from that fateful Tuesday when America’s innocence about the world was shattered. After spending part of the afternoon wine-tasting at the Valenzuelo Winery and then strolling the boardwalk in Atlantic City, I returned to sit in the tranquility of my deck penning these words in the long shadows of the setting sun. As memories overwhelm me, I can’t but reflect on the change that has engulfed the land of my children. There are many questions being asked in the media, of the leaders of both major parties, of the political and every other pundit that abounds, but the one question above all is: Are we safer today? --which in my opinion is the wrong question to ask, but it still gets asked because then the politicians can twist it whichever way they wish, to make us feel more safer, or less, depending upon their political stripe. It is indeed sad that something so fundamental to the future of this great nation, has become so politicized. If anything, the question we should be asking is: as a civilized society, what have we learnt in the last 9 years, and as a result, are we stronger today as a nation?
The short answer is: we have learnt virtually nothing, and we are today a nation divided, a fissure that has made us weaker than any time in over a 100 years. The rest of this blog is my usual rambling reflection of this.
Millions enter America every year illegally from the South, and lie low for most of their lives, working peacefully to support our lifestyle. So the 20 that came here almost 10 years ago from a so-called “friendly” nation in the middle east, and laid low and trained and carried out their heinous act, was really not something that required any great level of organizational skill. So we tightened screening and airport security, but still the “shoe bomber” and the “underwear bomber” got in. So we tightened security even further, and all the flying public patiently suffered. Now we see a new breed of home-grown terrorists, such as the “Time Square” bomber, or the US Army Major in Texas that went on a shooting spree, or the US-born and raised muslim cleric now exiled in Yemen, spewing hatred in both English and Arabic over the internet. Then we have people like Jose Padilla and Jihad Jane that are born and brought up here, but have “embraced” this failed philosophy in a manner such that they become willing pawns in the hands of the extremist masterminds.
Is there one common thread in all the above referenced individuals? Yes, you probably guessed it: Islam. To use a biological analogy, researchers believe that we all carry a “cancer gene” which lies dormant in most of us so we don’t get cancer. But in a few of us something triggers it, maybe chemicals or radiation or what, we don’t know—and cancer results. Similarly, because it is such a tenet-based religion so anathema to any other, that most born Muslims and many born non-muslims raised in the shadow of Islam, have in them a “terror gene”, for the lack of a better phrase, “implanted” in their DNA at birth. Most of these “blade children” if you will, go through life being normal but, in a few, the “normal” will mean a proclivity for annihilation of the “disbeliever”. And because Islam is all encompassing, it is both a religious as well as a political philosophy. It imposes on a Muslim, to be a true believer, that he/she must live under the laws of shariah. As such, the term “American Muslim” is really an oxymoron (or for that matter “British Muslim” or “Indian Muslim” or any pluralistic secular democracy), for in the eyes of Allah, the just Muslim is just a Muslim. Period. No more, no less.
At what stage are these “blade children” most likely to turn significantly violent against the non-blade population? There is no clear indication of a “critical mass”, but once their number exceeds 10% of the general population, there is a greater likelihood of the “terror gene” getting activated. As such, the British and many European societies are sitting on powder kegs, as are both India and Israel. Except in the case of Israel, they have the guts and the means to use decisive and brutal force (but that also is getting to be a PR nightmare, with the enemy getting smarter). The US is fortunate in that only about 2% of the population are Muslim—yet we already see cases of home-grown terror! In populations where Muslims are greater than 50%, it is almost assured that the non-muslim population will disappear. The Muslim majority will either convert them, kill them (or rape them) or drive them out.
With their numbers so small here in the US, and the American fire-power almost certain to destroy any remote cave or mountain hideout with bunker-buster clusters or predator hellfires, the terror-gene-activated Muslim has evolved and become smarter. Think about it: with just 19 terrorists and a few hundred thousand dollars in funding, Al Queda was able to make itself the second most recognized franchise in the world in less than 10 years! It did that while driving America into a huge over-reaction that contributed to the country going into the deepest recession in 70 years accompanied by joblessness and budget deficits assured for years to come, not to mention the thousands of soldiers lives lost in combat. And on top of that, Americans have become deeply divided over the most ridiculous of things, and don’t even talk to each other on the serious issues! So much so that for the first time, the US dropped on the global “competitiveness index” to 4th place! These are remarkable victories for a rag-tag bunch of Bedouins holed out in some village or cave in Southern Waziristan.
One example of the enemy using smarts to divide the American society was the “ground zero” mosque controversy that they created. From the politically correct Left to the xenophobic Right, to the pedagogic President, just about everybody got this issue wrong--and fell into the trap that the reputedly progressive Sunni peace-loving Imam of the Cordoba Initiative had set. I don’t know it was a trap, but must assume that Muslims (and the Imam in particular) are not that tone-deaf as to try and piss on or near hallowed ground! Now, they have the right to do as they please so long as no laws are being broken but, with the mosque a couple blocks from Ground Zero, it was bound to attract the good and malevolent attention of imams, clerics and other holy/unholy types from across the Islamic diaspora who would want to come there and preach. A “constitutional right” and what is right from a societal and sentimental standpoint, are not always the same—and the President certainly got this one all wrong. The total silence in the Muslim community indicated that they were either (a) completely oblivious and tone-deaf, or (b) they did this knowing fully well what they were doing
Or, take the “controversy” over the proposed burn-a-koran-a-day by a 50-member church in Florida. Again, everybody and his uncle got in on the act. Even the general overseeing operations in Afghanistan got involved calling it an endangerment to our troops. Even the people in Afghanistan and Pakistan demonstrated and burnt the US flag (as an aside, I observe Pakistanis, perhaps because they are more recent converts or are half-blood Muslims, tend to show their faith more fully by defending the Koran more vigorously than, say, the Saudis!). I never could understand why Muslims get so inflamed at any affront to their religion, real or perceived, in the present or in the future, as to take laws into their own hands and do the exact same things to others that they feel so insulted about for being done to them? No matter, this IMO was a non-issue. If the Florida church wished to practice their 1st Amendment right in this very asinine manner, then so be it—I mean one doesn’t have to be an Arab to be dumb! If people half way across the world whose only “constitution” is the Koran, are offended that our dumb people in Gainesville, Florida also have a Constitutional right to express their views in a stupid way, then too bad.
Which brings me back to the original question: are we stronger today than at the beginning of the decade? In just about every measure, be it the economy, global competitiveness, jobs, middle-class, manufacturing base, future outlook, or even respect for our fellow man, the answer in all cases is a “no”. This house has never been more divided in the last sesquicentennial years, with one group opposing the other not because it is right for the future of our children, but because it has become a game of political football and that every move of your opponent needs to be blocked and tackled at every step of the way so as to wrestle control of the ball. And while we are locked in this mortal game of chicken, the world is quietly but surely passing us by!